Disciple or Prophet?

Christianity says that John, Matthew, Mark and Luke received revelation from God to write their gospels, but Jesus himself, the core of Christianity, received no revelation from God.

Islam says that revelation should come from God to every prophet, who in turn passes it to people. Islam says that it is incomprehensible that disciples or disciples of disciples receive God's revelation but the prophet himself, i.e., Jesus, receives no revelation. Muhammad, the prophet of Islam, received a revelation, i.e., the Holy Quran. Even his sayings were also revealed to him.

Which is more acceptable to you: a religion whose founder received no revelation OR a religion whose prophet did reveive a revelation? What would you choose? Do you prefer to follow disciples of a prophet or the prophet himself?

Internal Inconsistencies:
The gospels of the New Testament give contradictory stories about the same incident. Sometimes the one gospel contradict itself. There are hundreds of inter-gospel and intra-gospel contradictions. This proves that those gospels are human reports and not divine revelations. God knows all the truth and He cannot give contradictory reports. This means that the New Testament is not a revealed text. The obvious conclusion is that Christianity does not have a revealed scripture now. When the preacher in the church carries the Bible and describes it as "the word of God", he is not telling the truth. Had the Bible been God's word, it would not have included hundreds and thousands of inner-contradictions.

In contrast, the Quran gives one story about each incident. It shows no inner-contradictions.

Which is the word of God: the Bible with its thousands of inner-contradictions OR the Quran with its absolute preciseness and correctness?