Paulinity or Christianity?

Jesus did not say that God is three in one; nor that he is God's son, nor that salvation is by cricifixion, nor that a man in naturally sinful, nor that he is God. What Christianity preaches is the opposite of what Jesus taught.

Christianity, as it is, is mainly the product of Paul. Had the church been fair to Paul, it would have called their religion Paulinity, after Paul, not Christianity, after Jesus Christ, who completely disagrees with the basic creeds of the religion. Christianity is falsely attributed to Jesus. Paulinity is a more honest and fair name.

As said before, God never called Jesus' teachings "Christianity". The term "Christianity" never appears anywhere in the Bible, neither in the Old Testament nor in the New Testament. If God had meant Christianity to be his final religion, He would have given it a name.

The creed of Christianity has nothing to do with Jesus Christ. The term "Christianity" is invented by Churchmen. Christianity with its creeds and name is made by churchmen, not by Jesus.

In contrast, Islamic creeds, laws, worship acts and ethics are completely divinely revealed. Islam was not made by scholars as Christianity was made by churchmen. Islam, basics and details, was God's word revealed in the Quran and the sayings of Prophet Muhammad.

Which do you choose as divine: Christianity, which was invented by Paul and churchmen, OR Islam, which was revealed by God?

Greetings and Best Wishes:

In the New Testament, at the end of Paul's epistles, we often read Paul sending his personal greetings and best wishes to other men or womenRT other towns or countries. There is nothing wrong with being sociable and courteous, for sure.

But the question is this: when you read personal greetings and best wishes at the end of Paul's letters, do you feel that those greetings are God's revelation? The church says that the epistles of Paul are God's revelation. Does God include in His revelation the greetings of Paul to his friends?

Those Paulian greetings are not in the interest of Paul. They prove that the letters of Paul are his own production and has no single atom of divine revelation in them.

No one can hide the truth forever. As was said, you can deceive some people some of the time, but you cannot deceive all people all the time. Paul's letters are Paul's letters. Thats all the truth about them. Paul never received divine revelation. He is the one who undermined the teachings of Jesus, cancelled the Law of Moses, and founded a new religion.

Islam says that no prophet came after Jesus except Muhammad. No prophet came between Jesus and Muhammad. No prophet came or will come after Muhammad. God says this clearly and definitely in the Holy Quran. The disciples of Jesus are only disciples. They never received divine revelation. Paul, the disciple of a disciple, never received revelation. The proof is the content of his letters, his personal greetings and best wishes, what he did to Jesus and his teachings, what he did to the Law of Moses, and what he said explicitly. Paul confessed that he saw Jesus and heard him in a dream (Acts 26:19). Can we accept dreams as revelations? If so, all dreamers are receivers of revelation! If so, all dreamers are conveyors of God's word! If so, all dreamers are prophets! If so, all humans are prophets!

Can you accept Paul's greetings and best wishes to specific friends as divine revelation? Can you consider Paul's dream as revelation?

Revised Bible:
There is a version of the Bible called "Revised version of the Bible". "Revised" means "modified". If the Bible is God's word, no one has the right to revise it or modify it or add to it or omit from it. Being in the need of revision, the Bible cannot be God's word. Being actually revised, the Bible is no more God's word.

In contrast, the Quran, the Holy Book of Islam, has no revised versions. It has never been revised or modified or abridged. It is God's only pure word available right now.

Which do you choose as God's pure word: the revised Bible or the non-revised Quran?